Emilio Nava vs Chris Rodesch Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In terms of recent performance on second serve points, Rodesch has secured 46.24% of points in the past six months, while Nava has achieved a slightly higher rate of 46.82%. This comparison provides an insight into the potential outcome of their match, given the high correlation of this statistic with match prediction accuracy.

When examining their return games during the same period, Rodesch has prevailed on 45.84% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Nava leads marginally with 46.98%. On first serve returns, Rodesch has a success rate of 25.88%, compared to Nava's 24.95%, influencing the expectations for the head-to-head matchup.

Consideration of how players handle pressure is crucial, and Rodesch shows an advantage here, saving 54.84% of breakpoints, compared to Nava's 52.55%. Over the past year, Rodesch has been in superb form, winning 78.05% of matches (64 out of 82), while Nava has won 59.76% of his encounters (49 out of 82), highlighting a clear performance disparity that could influence predictions.

Focusing on surface preferences, Rodesch has excelled on hard courts, boasting an impressive 83% win rate (38 out of 46 matches), but has underperformed on indoor hard surfaces. In contrast, Nava's best performances have been on clay with a 69% win rate, although he struggles on grass.

Direct head-to-head confrontations reveal that Rodesch and Nava have faced off once, with Nava emerging victorious. The match's duration averaged 83 minutes, emphasizing the intensity and competitive nature. While no deciding sets or tiebreaks have been played between them, comparing their overall records shows Rodesch excelling in deciding sets with a 79% win rate compared to Nava’s 52%.

Analyzing the quality of opponents over the past year, Rodesch has encountered players with an average ranking of 394.5, while Nava has faced relatively stronger competition with opponents averaging a ranking of 257.74. In terms of event-level experience, Rodesch has excelled in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, with a win rate of 89.36%, whereas Nava has been more active on the Challengers/ITF >$10K circuit with a 67.61% success rate.

Recent form in conversion of breakpoints reveals Rodesch's 30.37% success compared to Nava's superior 38.59%, an essential factor for live betting enthusiasts. Considering all available data, Nava is slightly favored to win, backed by his superior performance metrics across various dimensions.